In peaceful society like Singapore such vandalism in the MRT can be a sort of sensational news and create center stage focus by the people and government and generated many mixed positive and negative reaction from the public, government and net citizen alike, some commented that in Singapore they cannot allow, especially foreigners, to come in and spread their vile mischief of graffiti. Others commented that it does not make economic sense to begin to extradite them back to Singapore. Simply don't allow them in ever or even stop them from even passing through Singapore the next time.
Meanwhile..the following blog..makes interesting reading.
Think what you may, but the writer does have a point.
Quote from http://hardhitting-nobs.blogspot.com/
“Yes, Singapore is going to extradite a man for vandalism! People in Indonesia must be laughing their guts out when they hear this. There are over 10 Indonesian millionaires currently living in Singapore who are wanted by Indonesia for various corruption charges but Singapore has constantly refused to extradite them back to Indonesia.
Now Singapore wants to extradite a man from Hong Kong for vandalism!
Is vandalism more serious than corruption? In Singapore, that seems to be the case.
Who says Singapore does not have a sense of humor?”
An Act to Provide Authority to the Federal Power Marketing Administrations to Reduce Vandalism and Destruction of Property, and for Other Purposes (SuDoc AE 2.110:107-78)
An Act to Amend Chapter 91 of Title 18, United States Code, to Provide Criminal Penalties for Theft and Willful Vandalism at National Cemeteries (SuDoc AE 2.110:105-101)
Church Arson Prevention Act of 1996 : report (to accompany H.R. 3525) (including cost estimate of the Congressional Budget Office) (SuDoc Y 1.1/8:104-621)
Church Arson Prevention Act of 1996 (SuDoc AE 2.110:104-155)
